Catch21Catch21 is a charitable production company set up in 2005 which produces videos and other new media content to help engage young people with politics and their communities.Catch CreativeThe new video consultancy service from Catch21. Catch Creative offers a complete video production service, from Conception to Distribution.Catch EngagementCatch Engagement is the new video interaction platform from Catch21 which allows you to run a campaign using both user generated films as well as professionally shot ones which are displayed via Video 'Walls'. Catch Engagement is all about using films to build an online community - welcome to the future of video.

We shoot cutting edge videos and provide a forum to give people a voice.
Engagement. Discussion. Empowerment.


All content featured on our charity site is produced by young volunteers with the support and mentoring of our professional production team.

International no image

Published on June 26th, 2012 | by Usman Butt
Image © [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="566"] Simon Wiesenthal Centre in LA. Rights: Cbl62[/caption]   A controversial spin off museum to the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Angeles is being built in Jerusalem, Israel. The Simon Wiesenthal Centre is a Jewish human rights centre, dedicated to confronting anti-semitism, hate and terrorism, defends the safety of Jews worldwide and teaches lessons of the holocaust to future generations. The New Museum is Jerusalem is set to expand on this theme, the controversy lies in the chosen location of this museum. The location is Mamilla Cemetery, an ancient Muslim cemetery which dates back to the Byzantine era. Many significant figures in the Muslim world are buried there ranging from scholars to rulers. The ancient site was allocated to the Wiesenthal centre in 2000 by the Jerusalem municipality, with the approval of the Israeli antiquity authority. However, there has been a strong opposition to the use of this site from Muslim groups, Palestinian groups and from sections of the Israeli media. Professor Rashid Khalidi of Columbia University claimed “This project is a grotesque attempt to erase the well-established history of a continuous Muslim presence in the city that dates back over a millennium.” Supporters of the project state that part of the cemetery has been used as a parking lot for the past 50 years. Avra Shapiro director of public relations at the Simon Wiesenthal centre wrote in a letter to the Daily Beast that the museum will be over the parking lot. He goes on to say that the idea that they will be uprooting graves is not true. However, he does not outright deny that the Museum will be built over the cemetery. Petitions have been signed against it and even challenges in the Israeli high court of justice, by Muslim groups who have set out to stop the project. These challenges failed and the Jerusalem city council gave their final approval to the building of the museum last summer. Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder of the project said that the museum will deal with international conflicts but not the Middle Eastern conflict.  Alongside Muslim and Palestinian opposition to the use of this site has been international opposition.  Groups such as the centre for constitutional rights has released video footage that suggests that archaeological artefacts and human remains still exist even in the parking lot.  Some Palestinian and Palestinian solidarity groups have turned to the United Nations. The destruction of this ancient site and the potential loss to world heritage makes this issue of grave importance.  In addition to this, it is set to further escalate tensions in a troubled region to boiling point.  However, this episode should not be understood in isolation. There is a wider context which makes this issue even more sensitive. As the quote from Rashid Khalidi indicates there is a sense amongst Palestinians that this latest incident is part of a greater attempt to destroy and deny a Palestinian presence in the Holy Land. The process which has been called many names from internal colonialism, Hebrewization, Judification, de-Arabization and de-Palestinization by Palestinians and some scholars. Israeli-born historian Ilan Pappe wrote about the process of Hebrewization in his book ‘the ethnic cleansing of Palestine’.  Pappe stated that, before the creation of the state of Israel, the Zionist leadership in British mandate Palestine set up naming committees, whose function it was to re-name the mostly Arab towns and villages from Arabic names to Hebrew names. These Hebrew names became official after the founding of the state of Israel and the expulsion of 700,000 Palestinians from the newly formed state.  As well as renaming places, the state of Israel changed the topography of the land which  included removing the houses and structures in what had been Arab towns and villages and replacing them with European houses and structure, as well as repopulating the towns and villages with Jewish populations. In some cases as Pappe documents, some of the destroyed towns and villages were converted into national parks and forests. Palestinians view the latest attempt to build a museum over the cemetery as being part of a process which has gone on for over sixty years. There is a general belief amongst Palestinians that Israel does not want them to exist. They view the latest incident as part of a systematic attempt to wipe their history out, as former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir once said “There are no Palestinians”.  The idea of there being no Palestinians, has been brought up in the US presidential elections with Newt Gingrich, who claimed that the Palestinians were an invented people and terrorists. With all that has happened and continues to happen, for Palestinians the cemetery’s destruction is not just about the destruction of graves but also about the destruction of them as a people.

3

The Museum of ‘Tolerance’ and lessons in dePalestization and Hebrewization of the landscape

Simon Wiesenthal Centre in LA. Rights: Cbl62

 

A controversial spin off museum to the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Angeles is being built in Jerusalem, Israel. The Simon Wiesenthal Centre is a Jewish human rights centre, dedicated to confronting anti-semitism, hate and terrorism, defends the safety of Jews worldwide and teaches lessons of the holocaust to future generations. The New Museum is Jerusalem is set to expand on this theme, the controversy lies in the chosen location of this museum. The location is Mamilla Cemetery, an ancient Muslim cemetery which dates back to the Byzantine era. Many significant figures in the Muslim world are buried there ranging from scholars to rulers.

The ancient site was allocated to the Wiesenthal centre in 2000 by the Jerusalem municipality, with the approval of the Israeli antiquity authority. However, there has been a strong opposition to the use of this site from Muslim groups, Palestinian groups and from sections of the Israeli media. Professor Rashid Khalidi of Columbia University claimed “This project is a grotesque attempt to erase the well-established history of a continuous Muslim presence in the city that dates back over a millennium.” Supporters of the project state that part of the cemetery has been used as a parking lot for the past 50 years. Avra Shapiro director of public relations at the Simon Wiesenthal centre wrote in a letter to the Daily Beast that the museum will be over the parking lot. He goes on to say that the idea that they will be uprooting graves is not true. However, he does not outright deny that the Museum will be built over the cemetery.

Petitions have been signed against it and even challenges in the Israeli high court of justice, by Muslim groups who have set out to stop the project. These challenges failed and the Jerusalem city council gave their final approval to the building of the museum last summer. Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder of the project said that the museum will deal with international conflicts but not the Middle Eastern conflict.  Alongside Muslim and Palestinian opposition to the use of this site has been international opposition.  Groups such as the centre for constitutional rights has released video footage that suggests that archaeological artefacts and human remains still exist even in the parking lot.  Some Palestinian and Palestinian solidarity groups have turned to the United Nations.

The destruction of this ancient site and the potential loss to world heritage makes this issue of grave importance.  In addition to this, it is set to further escalate tensions in a troubled region to boiling point.  However, this episode should not be understood in isolation. There is a wider context which makes this issue even more sensitive. As the quote from Rashid Khalidi indicates there is a sense amongst Palestinians that this latest incident is part of a greater attempt to destroy and deny a Palestinian presence in the Holy Land. The process which has been called many names from internal colonialism, Hebrewization, Judification, de-Arabization and de-Palestinization by Palestinians and some scholars.

Israeli-born historian Ilan Pappe wrote about the process of Hebrewization in his book ‘the ethnic cleansing of Palestine’.  Pappe stated that, before the creation of the state of Israel, the Zionist leadership in British mandate Palestine set up naming committees, whose function it was to re-name the mostly Arab towns and villages from Arabic names to Hebrew names. These Hebrew names became official after the founding of the state of Israel and the expulsion of 700,000 Palestinians from the newly formed state.  As well as renaming places, the state of Israel changed the topography of the land which  included removing the houses and structures in what had been Arab towns and villages and replacing them with European houses and structure, as well as repopulating the towns and villages with Jewish populations. In some cases as Pappe documents, some of the destroyed towns and villages were converted into national parks and forests.

Palestinians view the latest attempt to build a museum over the cemetery as being part of a process which has gone on for over sixty years. There is a general belief amongst Palestinians that Israel does not want them to exist. They view the latest incident as part of a systematic attempt to wipe their history out, as former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir once said “There are no Palestinians”.  The idea of there being no Palestinians, has been brought up in the US presidential elections with Newt Gingrich, who claimed that the Palestinians were an invented people and terrorists. With all that has happened and continues to happen, for Palestinians the cemetery’s destruction is not just about the destruction of graves but also about the destruction of them as a people.

Tags: , , , , , ,


About the Author

Usman Butt

Usman graduated in 2012 with an MA in Palestine Studies from the University Of Exeter. Before that he read Arabic Language and International Relations at the University of Westminster. Amongst his proudest achievements include winning a muffin for public speaking, winning a Lego set at age 5 and helping Palestinian refugees learn English. Usually writes about genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, Israel/Palestinian politics, Iranian/Syrian/Lebanese politics, the Arab Spring, philosophy, religion, British politics, Foreign Policy, history and social issues. He enjoys writing as he sees it as an outlet to express his opinions about the public discourse on these issues. He believes writing is a good way of keeping productive and teaching yourself new things.



Usman Butt says:

Hi Scarlett,

In fact, the Palestinians have disputed this site, as well as many other sites for the past 60 years. The reason that this debate now exists, is because it's gone through a process of internationalization. Solidarity with Palestine, is very much and international issue as well as a local one.

I am not sure if you are saying my article is dishonest, or if the people arguing against it are dishonest?

Usman Butt says:

Hi Scarlett,

In fact this site like many others, has been disputed by the Palestinians since the 1940's. The only difference now, is that the debate has been internationalized due to the rise in global solidarity with Palestine.

Scarlett says:

then why didnt they complain for the last 50 years when the entire site where the cemetry used to be was a parking lot? i think this isn't an honest debate.

Back to Top ↑